There will be no weapon strikes that hit at a different time than a pulse. It syncs perfectly with the pulses from consecrate that happen every 12 frames. PS gets a stack every 24 frames since its attack is now rounded up to 24 from 23.3. Looking at this again with the 21 and 25 ICDs in mind along with the rounding up rule, Yes, Pig will end up being better overall if it is 25 frames Please let me know if you see anything wrong with my analysis! Thanks! TL:DR Pig Sticker and Hack have identical BOTS stacks except for a 3 frame interval (0.05 secs) when assuming continuous consecration is on the ground. PS Stricken ICD finishes at (23.3rd frame + 21 Frame CD) = the 34.3rd frame and then gets +1 stacked by a pulse consecrate pulse at 36 frames along with Hack. PS strikes every 23.3 frames while Hack strikes every 26.8 frames so in the intial attack, PS will gain a stack advantage over H by 1 because its ICD is only 21 frames but the advantage only lasts 3 frames until H gets another stack from consecrate pulse at frame 24. You would think that the only other deviation would be the actual weapon strikes from either the PS or H hitting that 3 frame gap at every other interval giving the PS a stack lead. So at least from my analysis, unless the ICD of one weapon is 12 frames shorter, both of these weapons will obtain a stricken stack on every other pulse of consecrate leading to identical stacking rates. (F = Frames) Pulses # of PS Stacks # of H Stacks # of Frames Elpsed This consecrate applies a potential stricken stack every 12 Frames (60 frames per second, 0.2 seconds a pulse) so it would be like According to the link that you pasted in your spreadsheet, the BOTS should have ICD of 24 frames, not 25, for Hack as:
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |